![]() ![]() ![]() The test I've run is a watermarking, and as expected the quad Opteron pounds the Mini into the ground. The i5 is a 2018 process, the 6276 is a 2011 processor. I've been running a test between my 2018 Mac Mini with i5 6 core vs a new build (of old components) quad Opteron 6276. I think cpu history performance is a little overstated. The Nvidia GPUs would enable AI/ML developers to use Macs as the platform. It would be good if these new Macs can support external Nvidia GPUs! ARM is now owned by Nvidia. Its single core performance is 1,575 and multicore performance is around 5,000, using Geekbench 5. As a comparison, my wife's new Windows' laptop (Lenovo) has the current generation of Intel low-end i7 CPU with 4-cores. These Intel Mini and MBP used older generations of Intel CPUs. I'd love to shed my external GPU if I don't need it.Īpple had not been good in using the latest Intel CPUs for their Macs. but then again, this is the first Apple Silicon processor we're seeing. No, it's not as good as the Radeon RX 580 external GPU. So the M1 built in GPU is clearly way better than either of build in intel GPU by a ton. EXTERNAL GPU FOR MAC MINI PROCompatible for MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, Mac Mini, Microsoft Surface Pro 3/4, etc nVidia. Mini Intel native GPU (Intel UHD 630). Use Discrete GPU for External Monitor through Docking Station.Geekbench Compute benchmark (tests GPU, OPENCL test) Mini and MBP specs I just ran myself using Geekbench 5. And a 2018 MBP 13" w/ 2.7Ghz quadcore I7. I have a 2018 mini, 3.2ghz 6-core with a Radeon RX 580 in an e-GPU. It makes the need for an external eGPU much less likely. Spot on, I think the M1 integration and built in GPU are game changers. I know very little about this stuff, but it appears that the internal GPU inside the M1 chip is quite respectable. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |